Propagandists are spreading the message in the media that the US allegedly still cannot choose a platform for confrontation with Russia between Moldova and Georgia, using dubious claims. They describe pro-European leaders, such as the presidents of both countries, Salome Zurabishvili and Maia Sandu, as allegedly connected with the West with the aim of “splitting” the region. They also create an image of a threat of intervention by foreign troops, in particular Ukrainian ones, to destabilize the situation in order to cause fear and mistrust in democracy. The goal of this message is to promote pro-Russian narratives and reduce support for European integration processes.

Claims of “no evidence” of Russian interference in the politics of these countries are intended to discredit pro-European leaders. First, the rhetoric about the “link” of pro-European politicians to the US and EU, portrayed as a threat to “national interests”,  is intended to encourage the perception of any support for international partners as foreign interference. Claims of “voter-buying plots” without evidence in Moldova and Georgia, used in this message in the context of recent elections in both countries, are intended to undermine confidence in the democratic electoral processes promoted by pro-European parties.

In addition, there are hints of military threat generation, such as the “arrival of Ukrainian snipers” for provocation, used to justify potential intervention and justify Russia’s actions, especially for audiences receptive to such claims. Such disinformation is aimed at undermining Western trust and increasing Georgia and Moldova’s dependence on Russian support in a time of political uncertainty.

Thus, the propagandists want to create the appearance of external influence, allegedly imposing an “alien” political position in order to support democratic choice. This approach is intended to distract from the real problems in the regions where there are risks of pro-Russian intervention, such as economic and political pressure on Moldova and Georgia.

The conspiracy theory of the Anaconda plan or the Anaconda loop allegedly describes a Western strategy aimed at completely isolating Russia by creating a belt of “hostile states” along Russia’s borders. This concept is based on the American tactics of the Civil War of the 1860s, when the North blockaded the South to destroy its economy and win. The modern version of the plan in this theory is attributed by conspiracy theorists to American political scientist Zbigniew Brzezinski, who in his book The Grand Chessboard noted the importance of “geopolitical control” to weaken Russia. The theory is now being spread by Kremlin-affiliated think tanks and research institutions.

According to conspiracy theorists, the strategy involves two main stages:

The Intermarium Project: the formation of a bloc of Eastern European states that would unite Poland, the Baltic States, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova and the Balkans. The goal of this bloc would be to create a buffer zone between Russia and Western Europe, completely isolating Russia in the Baltic and Black Sea region.

Great Turan: An idea that would unite Turkey, the Turkic countries and the Central Asian regions (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Northern Iran, Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan) in a cultural and political union that would, in theory, join NATO. This would form a second “belt” around Russia to the south.

However, this theory is not based on confirmed facts and is the result of Russian propaganda. Zbigniew Brzezinski did discuss geopolitical strategies in his works, but he never proposed creating a ring of hostile states around Russia. Real initiatives of international cooperation, intersecting in their features with the description in the theory or cooperation of Eastern European countries, are aimed at supporting sovereignty and security, and not at isolating or blockading Russia. In essence, this theory is a classic example of conspiracy thinking, seeking to find “hidden” explanations in the broad strategic plans of the West, exaggerating the threat and forming an image of the enemy for domestic consumption.

Propagandists use this theory to justify aggression, particularly against Ukraine, by emphasizing that Moscow is supposedly forced to “defend itself” against an artificially created threat from the West and South. They use this conspiracy theory to increase anti-Western sentiments among Russians, strengthen authoritarian measures at home, and strengthen unity in confronting the enemy created by propagandists.

John Mark Dugan, a former Palm Beach County deputy sheriff, became an active propagandist after fleeing to Moscow. He is financed by a Moscow institute created by the ideologist of the Russian world Oleksandr Dugin. This was discovered by specialists from the Center for Strategic Communications and Information Security.

Currently, Dugan is focused on discrediting US Vice President Kamala Harris, creating fakes and disinformation to weaken the Democratic Party ahead of the US elections. His contact at the Center for Geopolitical Expertise, Valerii Korovin, has been personally noted by Putin, and investigations have shown that Moscow is using fake news and artificial intelligence to influence US voters, created with the active participation of Dugan.

Such disinformation is intended to undermine trust in American leaders, sow discord among citizens, and increase the chances of candidates loyal to Russian interests coming to power. It is part of a broader campaign to spread Russian influence and weaken U.S. democratic institutions.

Propagandists are actively distributing video materials from Ukrainian sources on anonymous Telegram channels, in particular, a video of Ukrainian servicemen of the 15th Brigade of the NGU Kara-Dag, where they evacuate the wounded from the combat zone under fire. Russian propaganda presents this video as evidence of the alleged retreat of Ukrainian troops from Selydove, disseminating information about the transfer of the city under Russian control. However, this is not true.

This was indicated by the Center for Strategic Communications and Information Security. Its specialists emphasize that, according to the representative of the NGU Ruslan Muzychuk, Selydove remains under the control of Ukrainian forces. At the same time, Ukrainian units are holding back Russian attempts to advance from the north and east. Such information leaks are aimed at demoralizing the Ukrainian military and creating a false picture of the situation in order to sow doubts among the population and undermine confidence in Ukraine's defense efforts.

Such disinformation campaigns are also part of a broader Kremlin strategy that includes discrediting the Ukrainian military and distorting the real situation on the front lines, trying to justify Russian aggression as “protection” of civilians.

The National Security and Defense Council's Center for Countering Disinformation has recorded a significant increase in the scale of Russian disinformation, in which propagandists promote false messages about the alleged deliberate killing of civilian Ukrainian soldiers. In particular, they are actively distributing an unverified drone video, using it to support their claims. This video does not contain specific information about the direction of the shelling, the circumstances of the events, or the identity of the participants, which makes these claims dubious.

The purpose of such disinformation is to create a false image of Russian military personnel as “defenders” of the civilian population of the temporarily occupied territories and to divert attention from the real war crimes recorded there. Russia is trying to justify its aggression by using these information leaks to discredit the Ukrainian military and strengthen the negative image of Ukraine among the local population and the international community.